Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Dinosaur Life

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,693 concurrent players against 1,824, a 2.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 1,954. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.7% week over week versus +4.5% for Dinosaur Life. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (267.9M vs 48.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Dinosaur Life is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,693
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 267.9M visits
VS
Dinosaur Life
1,824
playing now
1,829 24h peak Β· 48.6M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Dinosaur Life

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Dinosaur LifeDifference
Playing now4,6931,8242,869 (2.6Γ—)
24h peak6,2241,8294,395 (3.4Γ—)
24h average4,8301,4933,337 (3.2Γ—)
7-day peak7,5571,9365,621 (3.9Γ—)
7-day average5,1671,4403,727 (3.6Γ—)
30-day peak7,5571,9365,621 (3.9Γ—)
All-time peak7,7291,9545,775 (4.0Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 5.7%β–Ό 1.5%β€”
7d changeβ–² 15.7%β–² 4.5%β€”
Total visits267.9M48.6M219.3M (5.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)420.7K131.8K288.9K (3.2Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M962.1K2.4M (3.5Γ—)
Favorites5.6M87.3K5.5M (64.1Γ—)
Rating96.5%89.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#343#925of 7,662
Trending score-23.911.5β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 19, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Simβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Dinosaur Life.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Dinosaur Life β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals