Super Hero Tycoon vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,709 concurrent players against 997, a 4.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 1,994. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.7% week over week versus +8.4% for Super Hero Tycoon. Lifetime, Super Hero Tycoon has more visits (2.5B vs 267.9M). Full side-by-side history for Super Hero Tycoon and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Super Hero Tycoon
997
playing now
1,523 24h peak · 2.5B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,709
playing now
6,224 24h peak · 267.9M visits
Player count history
Super Hero TycoonBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Super Hero Tycoon | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 997 | 4,709 | 3,712 (4.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,523 | 6,224 | 4,701 (4.1×) |
| 24h average | 1,062 | 4,830 | 3,768 (4.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,930 | 7,557 | 5,627 (3.9×) |
| 7-day average | 1,139 | 5,167 | 4,028 (4.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,930 | 7,557 | 5,627 (3.9×) |
| All-time peak | 1,994 | 7,729 | 5,735 (3.9×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 2.1% | ▼ 5.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 8.4% | ▲ 15.7% | — |
| Total visits | 2.5B | 267.9M | 2.2B (9.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 125.2K | 420.7K | 295.5K (3.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 979K | 3.3M | 2.4M (3.4×) |
| Favorites | 15M | 5.6M | 9.4M (2.7×) |
| Rating | 81.6% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,403 | #343 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -20.1 | -23.9 | — |
| Created | Dec 11, 2016 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Super Hero Tycoon, 11 for Build to Survive [TESTING].