Build to Survive vs [Now] Catch a Monster
[Now] Catch a Monster currently leads with 16,647 concurrent players against 5,500, a 3.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Now] Catch a Monster at 30,412 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Build to Survive: -5.0% week over week versus -6.8% for [Now] Catch a Monster. Lifetime, [Now] Catch a Monster has more visits (437.5M vs 409.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [Now] Catch a Monster is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,500
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.1M visits
VS
[Now] Catch a Monster
16,647
playing now
16,647 24h peak · 437.5M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[Now] Catch a Monster
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [Now] Catch a Monster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,500 | 16,647 | 11,147 (3.0×) |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 16,647 | 9,395 (2.3×) |
| 24h average | 5,176 | 8,066 | 2,890 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 16,647 | 9,395 (2.3×) |
| 7-day average | 4,998 | 8,233 | 3,235 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 16,647 | 9,395 (2.3×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 30,412 | 23,160 (4.2×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.4% | ▼ 1.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.0% | ▼ 6.8% | — |
| Total visits | 409.1M | 437.5M | 28.5M |
| Visits (24h) | 490.8K | 662.3K | 171.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 5.6M | 2.1M (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 593.8K | 10.3M (18.4×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 97.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #334 | #94 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 13.2 | -7.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Nov 10, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Adventure | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for [Now] Catch a Monster.