Build to Survive vs Run a Restaurant!
Run a Restaurant! currently leads with 14,544 concurrent players against 5,945, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Run a Restaurant! at 16,521 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Run a Restaurant!: -0.6% week over week versus -4.0% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.1M vs 99.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Run a Restaurant! is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,945
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.1M visits
VS
Run a Restaurant!
14,544
playing now
16,521 24h peak · 99.5M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveRun a Restaurant!
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Run a Restaurant! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,945 | 14,544 | 8,599 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 16,521 | 9,269 (2.3×) |
| 24h average | 5,430 | 13,452 | 8,022 (2.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 16,521 | 9,269 (2.3×) |
| 7-day average | 5,049 | 12,285 | 7,236 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 16,521 | 9,269 (2.3×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 16,521 | 9,269 (2.3×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 3.5% | ▲ 12.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.0% | ▼ 0.6% | — |
| Total visits | 409.1M | 99.5M | 309.6M (4.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 511.8K | 828K | 316.1K (1.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 5.6M | 2.1M (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 668K | 10.3M (16.4×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 98.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #314 | #112 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 28.1 | 39.1 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Apr 1, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for Run a Restaurant!.