Build to Survive vs [QOL] Azure Latch
[QOL] Azure Latch currently leads with 15,220 concurrent players against 5,500, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [QOL] Azure Latch at 17,882 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours [QOL] Azure Latch: -3.7% week over week versus -5.1% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, [QOL] Azure Latch has more visits (544M vs 409.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [QOL] Azure Latch is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,500
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.1M visits
VS
[🌱QOL] Azure Latch
15,220
playing now
15,995 24h peak · 544M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[QOL] Azure Latch
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [QOL] Azure Latch | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,500 | 15,220 | 9,720 (2.8×) |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 15,995 | 8,743 (2.2×) |
| 24h average | 5,148 | 12,960 | 7,812 (2.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 16,789 | 9,537 (2.3×) |
| 7-day average | 4,992 | 10,409 | 5,417 (2.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 17,882 | 10,630 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 17,882 | 10,630 (2.5×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.1% | ▲ 33.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.1% | ▼ 3.7% | — |
| Total visits | 409.1M | 544M | 134.9M |
| Visits (24h) | 509.2K | 917K | 407.8K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 6M | 2.6M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 619.9K | 10.3M (17.6×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 96.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #336 | #105 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 11.5 | 100.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Dec 20, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for [QOL] Azure Latch.