Build to Survive vs [UPD!] Baddies
[UPD!] Baddies currently leads with 12,409 concurrent players against 4,896, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD!] Baddies at 20,398 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours [UPD!] Baddies: +9.4% week over week versus -5.8% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, [UPD!] Baddies has more visits (1.8B vs 409.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [UPD!] Baddies is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,896
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.1M visits
VS
[UPD!] Baddies 💅
12,409
playing now
16,817 24h peak · 1.8B visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[UPD!] Baddies
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [UPD!] Baddies | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,896 | 12,409 | 7,513 (2.5×) |
| 24h peak | 7,252 | 16,817 | 9,565 (2.3×) |
| 24h average | 4,958 | 10,122 | 5,164 (2.0×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,252 | 16,817 | 9,565 (2.3×) |
| 7-day average | 4,955 | 9,786 | 4,831 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,252 | 16,817 | 9,565 (2.3×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 20,398 | 13,146 (2.8×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.8% | ▲ 34.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.8% | ▲ 9.4% | — |
| Total visits | 409.1M | 1.8B | 1.4B (4.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 496.5K | 1.3M | 841K (2.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 9.4M | 5.9M (2.7×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 6.4M | 4.6M (1.7×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 83.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #355 | #124 | of 7,978 |
| Trending score | 0.2 | 13.7 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Oct 3, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for [UPD!] Baddies.