Build to Survive vs Climb and Drop a Lucky Block

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,435 concurrent players against 1,774, a 3.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 2,769. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.1M vs 30.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Climb and Drop a Lucky Block is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,435
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405.1M visits
VS
Climb and Drop a Lucky Block
1,774
playing now
2,769 24h peak Β· 30.5M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveClimb and Drop a Lucky Block

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Climb and Drop a Lucky BlockDifference
Playing now5,4351,7743,661 (3.1Γ—)
24h peak6,6072,7693,838 (2.4Γ—)
24h average5,3311,9243,407 (2.8Γ—)
7-day peak6,7442,7693,975 (2.4Γ—)
7-day average5,2461,8283,418 (2.9Γ—)
30-day peak6,7442,7693,975 (2.4Γ—)
All-time peak6,7442,7693,975 (2.4Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 0.9%β–Ό 4.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405.1M30.5M374.6M (13.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)504.1K204.1K300K (2.5Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.3M739.4K579.1K (1.8Γ—)
Favorites10.9M34.8K10.8M (311.8Γ—)
Rating96.2%96.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#304#857of 4,380
Trending score6.017.0β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021May 19, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Climb and Drop a Lucky Block.

Build to Survive vs Climb and Drop a Lucky Block β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals