Build to Survive vs Pine Fall [HORROR]
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,120 concurrent players against 1,361, a 3.8Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 2,765. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.1M vs 9.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Pine Fall [HORROR] is charted above.
Build to Survive π οΈ
5,120
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405.1M visits
VS
Pine Fall [HORROR]
1,361
playing now
2,144 24h peak Β· 9.2M visits
Player count history
Build to SurvivePine Fall [HORROR]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Pine Fall [HORROR] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,120 | 1,361 | 3,759 (3.8Γ) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 2,144 | 4,463 (3.1Γ) |
| 24h average | 5,332 | 1,579 | 3,753 (3.4Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 2,765 | 3,979 (2.4Γ) |
| 7-day average | 5,242 | 1,922 | 3,320 (2.7Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 2,765 | 3,979 (2.4Γ) |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 2,765 | 3,979 (2.4Γ) |
| 24h change | βΌ 0.7% | βΌ 9.9% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 405.1M | 9.2M | 395.9M (44.1Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 505.2K | 155.8K | 349.5K (3.2Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.3M | 615.1K | 720.6K (2.2Γ) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 86K | 10.8M (126.3Γ) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 88.7% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #315 | #989 | of 4,380 |
| Trending score | 6.4 | -56.4 | β |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | May 10, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Adventure | β |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs [] Ability Slap Tower 3Build to Survive vs Climb and Drop a Lucky BlockBuild to Survive vs [UPD] Anime Slap TowerCompare two other games β
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Pine Fall [HORROR].