Build to Survive vs FPSAirDrop Arena [S3]
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,283 concurrent players against 4,004. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,774. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 19.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and FPSAirDrop Arena [S3] is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,283
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
FPS🔥AirDrop Arena [S3]🔥
4,004
playing now
5,720 24h peak · 19.5M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveFPSAirDrop Arena [S3]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | FPSAirDrop Arena [S3] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,283 | 4,004 | 1,279 |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 5,720 | 887 |
| 24h average | 5,174 | 4,374 | 800 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 5,764 | 980 |
| 7-day average | 5,221 | 3,645 | 1,576 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 5,764 | 980 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 5,774 | 970 |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.0% | ▲ 33.7% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 19.5M | 385.5M (20.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 490.4K | 496.5K | 6.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.3M | 1.6M | 287.1K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 518.2K | 10.3M (21.0×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 96.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #314 | #437 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -3.3 | 72.3 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Apr 13, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs Build a TowerBuild to Survive vs Silly Simon SaysBuild to Survive vs [NEW MAP] Clean The Superstore!Compare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for FPSAirDrop Arena [S3].