Build to Survive vs Silly Simon Says

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,014 concurrent players against 4,258. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,778. Lifetime, Silly Simon Says has more visits (575.4M vs 405M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Silly Simon Says is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,014
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits
VS
Silly Simon Says
4,258
playing now
5,778 24h peak Β· 575.4M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveSilly Simon Says

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Silly Simon SaysDifference
Playing now5,0144,258756
24h peak6,6075,778829
24h average4,9704,256714
7-day peak6,7445,778966
7-day average5,1864,0181,168
30-day peak6,7445,778966
All-time peak6,7445,778966
24h changeβ–Ό 4.1%β–² 18.1%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405M575.4M170.4M
Visits (24h)481.5K440K41.4K
Visits (7d)1.3M1.5M226.2K
Favorites10.9M618.8K10.2M (17.5Γ—)
Rating96.2%81.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#335#399of 4,381
Trending score-15.321.4β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Feb 6, 2023β€”
GenreSurvivalParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Silly Simon Says.

Build to Survive vs Silly Simon Says β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals