Build to Survive vs PLS DONATE
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,869 concurrent players against 4,592. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,783 concurrent players, versus 5,043. Lifetime, PLS DONATE has more visits (5.2B vs 405.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and PLS DONATE is charted above.
Build to Survive π οΈ
5,869
playing now
6,783 24h peak Β· 405.5M visits
VS
PLS DONATE πΈ
4,592
playing now
5,043 24h peak Β· 5.2B visits
Player count history
Build to SurvivePLS DONATE
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | PLS DONATE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,869 | 4,592 | 1,277 |
| 24h peak | 6,783 | 5,043 | 1,740 |
| 24h average | 5,559 | 4,170 | 1,389 |
| 7-day peak | 6,783 | 5,043 | 1,740 |
| 7-day average | 5,306 | 3,763 | 1,543 |
| 30-day peak | 6,783 | 5,043 | 1,740 |
| All-time peak | 6,783 | 5,043 | 1,740 |
| 24h change | β² 6.2% | β² 3.9% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 405.5M | 5.2B | 4.8B (12.8Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 522.9K | 929.6K | 406.7K (1.8Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.7M | 3.6M | 1.9M (2.1Γ) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 4.4M | 6.5M (2.5Γ) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 93.0% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #325 | #432 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 17.8 | 38.9 | β |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Feb 5, 2022 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Social | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for PLS DONATE.