Build to Survive vs PLS DONATE

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,869 concurrent players against 4,592. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,783 concurrent players, versus 5,043. Lifetime, PLS DONATE has more visits (5.2B vs 405.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and PLS DONATE is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,869
playing now
6,783 24h peak Β· 405.5M visits
VS
PLS DONATE πŸ’Έ
4,592
playing now
5,043 24h peak Β· 5.2B visits

Player count history

Build to SurvivePLS DONATE

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive PLS DONATEDifference
Playing now5,8694,5921,277
24h peak6,7835,0431,740
24h average5,5594,1701,389
7-day peak6,7835,0431,740
7-day average5,3063,7631,543
30-day peak6,7835,0431,740
All-time peak6,7835,0431,740
24h changeβ–² 6.2%β–² 3.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405.5M5.2B4.8B (12.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)522.9K929.6K406.7K (1.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.7M3.6M1.9M (2.1Γ—)
Favorites10.9M4.4M6.5M (2.5Γ—)
Rating96.2%93.0%β€”
Global rank (players)#325#432of 4,743
Trending score17.838.9β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Feb 5, 2022β€”
GenreSurvivalSocialβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for PLS DONATE.

Build to Survive vs PLS DONATE β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals