Build to Survive vs Speed Clicker
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,869 concurrent players against 4,220. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,783 concurrent players, versus 5,042. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.5M vs 258.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Speed Clicker is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,869
playing now
6,783 24h peak · 405.5M visits
VS
Speed Clicker ⚡
4,220
playing now
5,042 24h peak · 258.6M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveSpeed Clicker
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Speed Clicker | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,869 | 4,220 | 1,649 |
| 24h peak | 6,783 | 5,042 | 1,741 |
| 24h average | 5,564 | 3,699 | 1,865 (1.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,783 | 5,042 | 1,741 |
| 7-day average | 5,308 | 2,752 | 2,556 (1.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,783 | 5,042 | 1,741 |
| All-time peak | 6,783 | 5,042 | 1,741 |
| 24h change | ▲ 6.3% | ▲ 12.7% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405.5M | 258.6M | 146.9M (1.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 527.6K | 651.9K | 124.3K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.7M | 2.3M | 559.9K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 19.6M | 8.8M (1.8×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 93.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #320 | #470 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 18.0 | 121.7 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Dec 30, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Speed Clicker.