Build to Survive vs Build and Survive

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,831 concurrent players against 4,282. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,783 concurrent players, versus 5,046. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405.4M vs 228.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Build and Survive is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,831
playing now
6,783 24h peak Β· 405.4M visits
VS
πŸ› οΈBuild and Survive
4,282
playing now
5,046 24h peak Β· 228.1M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveBuild and Survive

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Build and SurviveDifference
Playing now5,8314,2821,549
24h peak6,7835,0461,737
24h average5,6044,1131,491
7-day peak6,7835,0461,737
7-day average5,3143,3281,986 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak6,7835,0461,737
All-time peak6,7835,0461,737
24h changeβ–² 6.1%β–² 10.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405.4M228.1M177.4M (1.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)524K358.4K165.6K
Visits (7d)1.7M1.1M624.1K (1.6Γ—)
Favorites10.9M8M2.9M
Rating96.2%96.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#301#435of 4,743
Trending score20.484.6β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Mar 25, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Build and Survive.

Build to Survive vs Build and Survive β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals