Build to Survive vs Elemental Magic Arena []

Elemental Magic Arena [] currently leads with 4,412 concurrent players against 4,181. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 6,202. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 109M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Elemental Magic Arena [] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
4,181
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits
VS
Elemental Magic Arena [⚑]
4,412
playing now
6,202 24h peak Β· 109M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveElemental Magic Arena []

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Elemental Magic Arena []Difference
Playing now4,1814,412231
24h peak6,6076,202405
24h average4,9464,422524
7-day peak6,7446,202542
7-day average5,1874,688499
30-day peak6,7446,202542
All-time peak6,7446,202542
24h changeβ–Ό 3.8%β–Ό 10.1%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405M109M296M (3.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)483.3K546.5K63.2K
Visits (7d)1.2M1.9M696.3K (1.6Γ—)
Favorites10.9M178.8K10.7M (60.7Γ—)
Rating96.2%91.6%β€”
Global rank (players)#370#347of 4,278
Trending score-17.1-20.6β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Aug 12, 2021β€”
GenreSurvivalActionβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Elemental Magic Arena [].

Build to Survive vs Elemental Magic Arena [] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals