Build to Survive vs Frigid Dusk

Build to Survive currently leads with 4,435 concurrent players against 4,220. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 6,207. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 88.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Frigid Dusk is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
4,435
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits
VS
Frigid Dusk
4,220
playing now
5,630 24h peak Β· 88.2M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveFrigid Dusk

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Frigid DuskDifference
Playing now4,4354,220215
24h peak6,6075,630977
24h average5,0404,222818
7-day peak6,7446,207537
7-day average5,2103,7461,464
30-day peak6,7446,207537
All-time peak6,7446,207537
24h changeβ–Ό 1.9%β–² 37.0%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405M88.2M316.7M (4.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)487.2K307.8K179.4K (1.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.2M973.8K231K
Favorites10.9M931.5K9.9M (11.7Γ—)
Rating96.2%82.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#348#364of 4,278
Trending score-12.045.8β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Jun 6, 2021β€”
GenreSurvivalAdventureβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Frigid Dusk.

Build to Survive vs Frigid Dusk β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals