Build to Survive vs Be a Hole
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,510 concurrent players against 1,868, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 3,105. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 252.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Be a Hole is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,510
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
🕳️ Be a Hole
1,868
playing now
3,105 24h peak · 252.6M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveBe a Hole
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Be a Hole | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,510 | 1,868 | 2,642 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 3,105 | 3,502 (2.1×) |
| 24h average | 4,886 | 1,876 | 3,010 (2.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 3,105 | 3,639 (2.2×) |
| 7-day average | 5,174 | 1,783 | 3,391 (2.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 3,105 | 3,639 (2.2×) |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 3,105 | 3,639 (2.2×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.9% | ▲ 4.6% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 252.6M | 152.4M (1.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 500.4K | 344.4K | 156K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 1.1M | 106.8K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 5.4M | 5.5M (2.0×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 84.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #353 | #855 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -20.4 | 16.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 23, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs Emergency EmdenBuild to Survive vs ART. 244 [ HUGE FIXES]Build to Survive vs Shrek in The BackroomsCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Be a Hole.