Build to Survive vs Emergency Emden
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,236 concurrent players against 1,095, a 3.9Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 3,103. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 135.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Emergency Emden is charted above.
Build to Survive π οΈ
4,236
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits
VS
Emergency Emden
1,095
playing now
3,103 24h peak Β· 135.6M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveEmergency Emden
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Emergency Emden | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,236 | 1,095 | 3,141 (3.9Γ) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 3,103 | 3,504 (2.1Γ) |
| 24h average | 4,954 | 1,809 | 3,145 (2.7Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 3,103 | 3,641 (2.2Γ) |
| 7-day average | 5,192 | 1,711 | 3,481 (3.0Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 3,103 | 3,641 (2.2Γ) |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 3,103 | 3,641 (2.2Γ) |
| 24h change | βΌ 3.6% | β² 12.5% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 405M | 135.6M | 269.4M (3.0Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 499.8K | 197.3K | 302.5K (2.5Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 658.4K | 559.1K (1.8Γ) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 221.2K | 10.6M (49.1Γ) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 87.4% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #369 | #1,135 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | -16.9 | 18.4 | β |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Mar 7, 2023 | β |
| Genre | Survival | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Emergency Emden.