Build to Survive vs Eat the World
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,494 concurrent players against 2,968, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (615.4M vs 404.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Eat the World is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,494
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 404.9M visits
VS
Eat the World
2,968
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.4M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveEat the World
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Eat the World | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,494 | 2,968 | 1,526 (1.5×) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 4,747 | 1,860 |
| 24h average | 5,093 | 3,783 | 1,310 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 5,240 | 1,504 |
| 7-day average | 5,224 | 3,786 | 1,438 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 5,240 | 1,504 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 5,261 | 1,483 |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.0% | ▼ 2.6% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 404.9M | 615.4M | 210.5M (1.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 498.2K | 403.6K | 94.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 1.3M | 110.6K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 27.8M | 16.9M (2.6×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 94.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #344 | #548 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | -9.3 | -0.3 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Feb 22, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for Eat the World.