Build to Survive vs Catalog Emotes Testing
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,828 concurrent players against 3,879. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,281. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (404.9M vs 29.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Catalog Emotes Testing is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,828
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 404.9M visits
VS
Catalog Emotes Testing ✨
3,879
playing now
5,247 24h peak · 29.1M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveCatalog Emotes Testing
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Catalog Emotes Testing | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,828 | 3,879 | 949 |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 5,247 | 1,360 |
| 24h average | 5,185 | 3,982 | 1,203 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 5,247 | 1,497 |
| 7-day average | 5,245 | 3,575 | 1,670 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 5,247 | 1,497 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 5,281 | 1,463 |
| 24h change | ▲ 0.5% | ▲ 24.8% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 404.9M | 29.1M | 375.8M (13.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 502K | 535.9K | 33.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 1.2M | 3.7K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 235K | 10.6M (46.2×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 83.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #321 | #424 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | -4.2 | 40.7 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 4, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Build to Survive, 3 for Catalog Emotes Testing.