Build to Survive vs Conquer The World WW2

Build to Survive currently leads with 4,166 concurrent players against 3,675. On all-time peak the record belongs to Conquer The World WW2 at 10,085 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Conquer The World WW2: +8.9% week over week versus -6.3% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.7M vs 258.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Conquer The World WW2 is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️

4,166

playing now

6,972 24h peak · 409.7M visits

Conquer The World WW2 [🛡️]

3,675

playing now

7,695 24h peak · 258.2M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveConquer The World WW2

Head to head

Metric	Build to Survive	Conquer The World WW2	Difference
Playing now	4,166	3,675	491
24h peak	6,972	7,695	723
24h average	5,214	5,310	96
7-day peak	7,086	8,481	1,395
7-day average	4,972	5,548	576
30-day peak	7,086	8,481	1,395
All-time peak	7,252	10,085	2,833
24h change	▼ 4.6%	▼ 11.9%	—
7d change	▼ 6.3%	▲ 8.9%	—
Total visits	409.7M	258.2M	151.5M (1.6×)
Visits (24h)	543.2K	530.9K	12.3K
Visits (7d)	3.4M	3.7M	271.5K
Favorites	10.9M	802.2K	10.1M (13.6×)
Rating	96.2%	80.7%	—
Global rank (players)	#347	#366	of 8,339
Trending score	18.0	-15.9	—
Created	Feb 12, 2021	Aug 13, 2023	—
Genre	Survival	Strategy	—

Other comparisons

Build to Survive vs [UPD] Drift Tag Build to Survive vs Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs World // Zero Anime RPG Build to Survive vs [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution Build to Survive vs [DAILY] Spiral Difficulty Chart Obby Compare two other games →

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive, 14 for Conquer The World WW2.