Build to Survive vs [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,268 concurrent players against 2,642, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution at 14,285 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Build to Survive: -6.2% week over week versus -33.5% for [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 53.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,268
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
VS
[🌴UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution
2,642
playing now
8,084 24h peak · 53.7M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,268 | 2,642 | 1,626 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 6,972 | 8,084 | 1,112 |
| 24h average | 5,269 | 3,532 | 1,737 |
| 7-day peak | 7,086 | 8,490 | 1,404 |
| 7-day average | 4,980 | 4,854 | 126 |
| 30-day peak | 7,086 | 11,538 | 4,452 (1.6×) |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 14,285 | 7,033 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.6% | ▼ 13.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 6.2% | ▼ 33.5% | — |
| Total visits | 409.6M | 53.7M | 356M (7.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 551.7K | 562.2K | 10.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 4.8M | 1.3M |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 1.2M | 9.7M (8.9×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 98.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #350 | #577 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 21.5 | -96.2 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | May 30, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive, 14 for [UPD] +1 Muscle Evolution.