Build to Survive vs Capybara Onsen
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,344 concurrent players against 2,656, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 2,772. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 707K). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Capybara Onsen is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,344
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
Capybara Onsen ♨
2,656
playing now
2,772 24h peak · 707K visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveCapybara Onsen
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Capybara Onsen | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,344 | 2,656 | 2,688 (2.0×) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 2,772 | 3,835 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 5,218 | 2,293 | 2,925 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 2,772 | 3,972 (2.4×) |
| 7-day average | 5,230 | 2,220 | 3,010 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 2,772 | 3,972 (2.4×) |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 2,772 | 3,972 (2.4×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 0.2% | ▲ 58.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 707K | 404.3M (572.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 498.4K | 167.1K | 331.3K (3.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.3M | 188.5K | 1.1M (6.9×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 23.7K | 10.8M (458.0×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 94.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #308 | #656 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -0.8 | 10.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jul 15, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs [UPD] Anime Slap TowerBuild to Survive vs Climb and Drop a Lucky BlockBuild to Survive vs [+X60 Event CidBeta and Easter Egg NEW!]Rock FruitCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 3 for Capybara Onsen.