Natural Disaster Survival vs Build and Survive

Build and Survive currently leads with 7,783 concurrent players against 7,058. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 7,997. Momentum favours Build and Survive: +49.7% week over week versus -1.8% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 231.3M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Build and Survive is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
7,058
playing now
13,442 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
🛠️Build and Survive
7,783
playing now
7,997 24h peak · 231.3M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalBuild and Survive

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Build and SurviveDifference
Playing now7,0587,783725
24h peak13,4427,9975,445 (1.7×)
24h average9,2886,9532,335
7-day peak13,8527,9975,855 (1.7×)
7-day average9,6904,9284,762 (2.0×)
30-day peak13,8527,9975,855 (1.7×)
All-time peak15,1527,9977,155 (1.9×)
24h change 5.4% 21.4%
7d change 1.8% 49.7%
Total visits4.4B231.3M4.2B (19.1×)
Visits (24h)1.7M568.5K1.1M (3.0×)
Visits (7d)11.7M3M8.7M (3.9×)
Favorites11.8M8.1M3.7M
Rating90.8%96.7%
Global rank (players)#213#195of 8,017
Trending score-16.4157.1
CreatedMar 28, 2008Mar 25, 2025
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 12 for Build and Survive.