Natural Disaster Survival vs [CLONING] PAINT OR DIE!
Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 13,148 concurrent players against 7,341, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [CLONING] PAINT OR DIE! at 20,944 concurrent players, versus 15,152. Momentum favours Natural Disaster Survival: +1.8% week over week versus -38.5% for [CLONING] PAINT OR DIE!. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 162.5M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and [CLONING] PAINT OR DIE! is charted above.
Natural Disaster Survival
13,148
playing now
13,416 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
[CLONING👥] PAINT OR DIE!
7,341
playing now
7,822 24h peak · 162.5M visits
Player count history
Natural Disaster Survival[CLONING] PAINT OR DIE!
Head to head
| Metric | Natural Disaster Survival | [CLONING] PAINT OR DIE! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 13,148 | 7,341 | 5,807 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 13,416 | 7,822 | 5,594 (1.7×) |
| 24h average | 10,991 | 5,730 | 5,261 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 13,852 | 13,838 | 14 |
| 7-day average | 10,052 | 7,079 | 2,973 |
| 30-day peak | 13,852 | 13,838 | 14 |
| All-time peak | 15,152 | 20,944 | 5,792 |
| 24h change | ▲ 15.2% | ▲ 25.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 1.8% | ▼ 38.5% | — |
| Total visits | 4.4B | 162.5M | 4.3B (27.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 1.6M | 756.7K | 815.3K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 11.6M | 8.4M | 3.2M |
| Favorites | 11.8M | 462.6K | 11.3M (25.5×) |
| Rating | 90.8% | 93.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #121 | #240 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 37.7 | -71.4 | — |
| Created | Mar 28, 2008 | Jun 26, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 13 for [CLONING] PAINT OR DIE!.