Natural Disaster Survival vs Build and Crush

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 6,613 concurrent players against 5,778. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 7,973. Momentum favours Build and Crush: +40.2% week over week versus -2.4% for Natural Disaster Survival. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 12.7M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and Build and Crush is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
6,613
playing now
13,442 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
Build and Crush
5,778
playing now
7,246 24h peak · 12.7M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster SurvivalBuild and Crush

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival Build and CrushDifference
Playing now6,6135,778835
24h peak13,4427,2466,196 (1.9×)
24h average9,1115,1803,931 (1.8×)
7-day peak13,8527,9535,899 (1.7×)
7-day average9,6264,5685,058 (2.1×)
30-day peak13,8527,9535,899 (1.7×)
All-time peak15,1527,9737,179 (1.9×)
24h change 5.8% 9.7%
7d change 2.4% 40.2%
Total visits4.4B12.7M4.4B (348.1×)
Visits (24h)1.7M317K1.4M (5.3×)
Visits (7d)11.6M2M9.6M (5.7×)
Favorites11.8M450.3K11.3M (26.2×)
Rating90.8%93.1%
Global rank (players)#240#288of 8,017
Trending score-21.149.5
CreatedMar 28, 2008Sep 15, 2025
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 9 for Build and Crush.