Natural Disaster Survival vs [QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes Testing

Natural Disaster Survival currently leads with 10,617 concurrent players against 4,469, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Natural Disaster Survival at 15,152 concurrent players, versus 8,506. Momentum favours Natural Disaster Survival: +0.7% week over week versus -18.5% for [QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes Testing. Lifetime, Natural Disaster Survival has more visits (4.4B vs 141.1M). Full side-by-side history for Natural Disaster Survival and [QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes Testing is charted above.

Natural Disaster Survival
10,617
playing now
13,442 24h peak · 4.4B visits
VS
🤫[QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes Testing ✨
4,469
playing now
7,594 24h peak · 141.1M visits

Player count history

Natural Disaster Survival[QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric Natural Disaster Survival [QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now10,6174,4696,148 (2.4×)
24h peak13,4427,5945,848 (1.8×)
24h average10,5845,3435,241 (2.0×)
7-day peak13,8527,5946,258 (1.8×)
7-day average9,9574,2105,747 (2.4×)
30-day peak13,8527,5946,258 (1.8×)
All-time peak15,1528,5066,646 (1.8×)
24h change 9.8% 38.0%
7d change 0.7% 18.5%
Total visits4.4B141.1M4.3B (31.3×)
Visits (24h)1.7M760.9K894.3K (2.2×)
Visits (7d)11.6M4.1M7.5M (2.8×)
Favorites11.8M1.4M10.4M (8.7×)
Rating90.8%88.0%
Global rank (players)#148#375of 7,929
Trending score25.399.8
CreatedMar 28, 2008Feb 12, 2026
GenreSurvivalSocial

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Natural Disaster Survival, 12 for [QUIET ON THE CREEK] Emotes Testing.