Blood Zone vs [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step

[ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step currently leads with 4,435 concurrent players against 2,222, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step at 6,733 concurrent players, versus 2,633. Lifetime, [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step has more visits (90.8M vs 27.1M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone and [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step is charted above.

Blood Zone 🩸
2,222
playing now
2,633 24h peak · 27.1M visits
VS
[ASCENSION💫]+1 Shrink per Step
4,435
playing now
6,733 24h peak · 90.8M visits

Player count history

Blood Zone[ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step

Head to head

Metric Blood Zone [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per StepDifference
Playing now2,2224,4352,213 (2.0×)
24h peak2,6336,7334,100 (2.6×)
24h average2,0854,8562,771 (2.3×)
7-day peak2,6336,7334,100 (2.6×)
7-day average1,6913,9722,281 (2.3×)
30-day peak2,6336,7334,100 (2.6×)
All-time peak2,6336,7334,100 (2.6×)
24h change▲ 46.9%▲ 25.4%—
7d change———
Total visits27.1M90.8M63.7M (3.4×)
Visits (24h)145.3K568.1K422.8K (3.9×)
Visits (7d)414.9K1.7M1.2M (4.0×)
Favorites103.9K3.1M3M (30.1×)
Rating79.1%96.1%—
Global rank (players)#705#345of 4,278
Trending score76.381.5—
CreatedJul 4, 2023Apr 9, 2026—
GenreShooterSimulation—

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Blood Zone, 4 for [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step.

Blood Zone vs [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals