+1 Clean Haystack for Loot
#6,284Since Sep 26, 2026
Player count history
Performance analysis
Measured on average concurrent players rather than a single spike, +1 Clean Haystack for Loot is down 17.1% day over day.
Player counts by period
| Period | Average | Peak | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 24 hours | 34 | 59 | ▼ 17.1% |
| Last 7 days | 37 | 63 | — |
| Last 30 days | 36 | 63 | — |
| Since Sep 26, 2026 | — | 63 | 3 days tracked |
Growth
| Metric | 24h | 7d | 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visits gained | +4.6K | +8.7K | +8.3K |
| Favorites gained | +11 | +17 | +17 |
| Likes gained | +0 | 92.6% positive overall | |
| Dislikes gained | +0 | 25 👍 · 2 👎 | |
| Totals | 22.3K visits · 54 favorites | ||
Rankings
| Live players | #6,284 · Top 50% |
| 24h peak | #7,228 · Top 50% |
| Observed peak | #8,928 · Top 50% |
| Total visits | #15,836 |
| Favorites | #17,077 |
| In Simulation | #2,281 of 5,885 |
Records
| Highest recorded CCU | 63 · Sep 27, 2026 |
| Best day for visits | +5.8K · Sep 27, 2026 |
| 24h low | 8 |
| Avg. session (est.) | 10 min |
| Tracked since | Sep 26, 2026 |
| Days with recorded data | 3 days of history |
Daily breakdown
| Day (UTC) | Avg players | Peak players | Visits gained |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | 29 | 54 | +2.5K |
| Sep 27, 2026 | 40 | 63 | +5.8K |
Estimated developer earnings
Modeled from average concurrent players, assumed earned Robux per player-hour by genre, and a fixed $0.0038 per earned Robux. These are not reported game earnings. The range is the central model divided and multiplied by three, not a confidence interval; actual earnings may fall outside it. Special DevEx rates, purchases, revenue shares and expenses are not modeled. Not financial data. Model assumption for this game: 2 earned Robux per player-hour. Formula and limitations.
Visits history
Compare +1 Clean Haystack for Loot
Side-by-side player counts, peaks and growth against games of a similar size:
vs HUSTLE
vs Gymnastics RP
vs Blast a Block!
vs Build a Theme Park!Frequently asked questions
How many people are playing +1 Clean Haystack for Loot right now?
+1 Clean Haystack for Loot's latest recorded count is 61 concurrent players on Roblox, sampled at 2026-09-28 14:56 UTC. That is 79% above its average over the last 24 hours.
What is +1 Clean Haystack for Loot's highest recorded player count?
RoVitals began tracking +1 Clean Haystack for Loot on September 26, 2026; the highest count sampled since then is 63 on September 27, 2026; earlier peaks and peaks between samples may be higher.
How many visits does +1 Clean Haystack for Loot have?
+1 Clean Haystack for Loot has been played 22,319 times in total, 8,326 of them since RoVitals began tracking it on September 26, 2026.
How much money does +1 Clean Haystack for Loot make?
The RoVitals model puts +1 Clean Haystack for Loot's developer earnings at roughly $2–$19 a day, from its average concurrent players and a genre earnings assumption. Roblox does not publish per-game revenue, and actual earnings can differ several-fold.
Description from Roblox, by very fun haystack game
🪡 Welcome to +1 Clean Haystack for Loot! 1. Train your Strength 💨 2. Vacuum up the Hay 🍃 3. Collect Loot & Sell it! 💵 4. Buy new Vacuums and Upgrades ⬆️ 5. Rebirth and CLEAN THE WHOLE WORLD! 🔄 💤 You earn Strength while you're OFFLINE!
Similar Simulation games
| Game | Playing | 24h | 24h peak | Visits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Merge a Tank | ▼ 27.0% | 102 | 9.2M | |
 Dig to Bedrock! | ▼ 26.9% | 66 | 8.1M | |
![[UPD] Train Kaiju to Destroy icon](https://tr.rbxcdn.com/180DAY-5ddd1e650dc492bcdd4c508ae743b7f3/75/75/Image/Webp/noFilter){kind=small} [UPD] Train Kaiju to Destroy | ▼ 33.0% | 125 | 23.8M | |
 Build a Tower to Become Sniper | ▼ 25.8% | 264 | 7.9M | |
 +1 Hack Per Click | ▼ 36.1% | 97 | 11M | |
 🐧 Evolve & Survive! | ▼ 26.2% | 126 | 7.1M | |
![Ski Racing [UPD] icon](https://tr.rbxcdn.com/180DAY-cc69838ca8ebb1581b2880ca62e8f67e/75/75/Image/Webp/noFilter){kind=small} ⛷️Ski Racing [UPD✨] | ▼ 37.0% | 33 | 8.9M | |
 ⚔️MEGA Sword Evolution⚔️ | ▼ 18.2% | 19 | 4.6M |
History since Sep 26, 2026. Data methodology.