Bid Battles! vs [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
[FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death currently leads with 6,886 concurrent players against 331, a 20.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death at 10,397 concurrent players, versus 366. Lifetime, [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death has more visits (323.4M vs 194.1M). Full side-by-side history for Bid Battles! and [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death is charted above.
💰 Bid Battles!
331
playing now
366 24h peak · 194.1M visits
VS
[⏰FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
6,886
playing now
9,614 24h peak · 323.4M visits
Player count history
Bid Battles![FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death
Head to head
| Metric | Bid Battles! | [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 331 | 6,886 | 6,555 (20.8×) |
| 24h peak | 366 | 9,614 | 9,248 (26.3×) |
| 24h average | 289 | 7,067 | 6,778 (24.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 366 | 10,366 | 10,000 (28.3×) |
| 7-day average | 273 | 7,537 | 7,264 (27.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 366 | 10,366 | 10,000 (28.3×) |
| All-time peak | 366 | 10,397 | 10,031 (28.4×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 6.3% | ▼ 16.3% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 194.1M | 323.4M | 129.3M (1.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 20K | 531.1K | 511.1K (26.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 126K | 3.6M | 3.5M (28.9×) |
| Favorites | 412.7K | 635.9K | 223.2K (1.5×) |
| Rating | 90.0% | 87.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,301 | #245 | of 5,678 |
| Trending score | 13.3 | -23.9 | — |
| Created | May 11, 2022 | Mar 8, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 7 days for Bid Battles!, 7 for [FASHIONABLY LATE] Die of Death.