Every Click +1 Age vs Eat.io
Every Click +1 Age currently leads with 7 concurrent players against 5. On all-time peak the record belongs to Every Click +1 Age at 14 concurrent players, versus 14. Lifetime, Every Click +1 Age has more visits (936K vs 565.2K). Full side-by-side history for Every Click +1 Age and Eat.io is charted above.
Every Click +1 Age
7
playing now
9 24h peak Β· 936K visits
VS
πEat.io
5
playing now
9 24h peak Β· 565.2K visits
Player count history
Every Click +1 AgeEat.io
Head to head
| Metric | Every Click +1 Age | Eat.io | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| 24h peak | 9 | 9 | tie |
| 24h average | 4 | 4 | tie |
| 7-day peak | 14 | 14 | tie |
| 7-day average | 5 | 5 | tie |
| 30-day peak | 14 | 14 | tie |
| All-time peak | 14 | 14 | tie |
| 24h change | βΌ 20.0% | βΌ 33.3% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 936K | 565.2K | 370.8K (1.7Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 1.3K | 700 | 557 (1.8Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 8.2K | 1.7K | 6.4K (4.7Γ) |
| Favorites | 112.8K | 1.2K | 111.6K (94.0Γ) |
| Rating | 63.8% | 42.3% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #4,570 | #4,647 | of 6,254 |
| Trending score | 0.0 | 0.0 | β |
| Created | Feb 24, 2025 | Oct 25, 2025 | β |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 7 days for Every Click +1 Age, 3 for Eat.io.