Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower currently leads with 1,626 concurrent players against 1,118. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower at 4,443 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +10.6% week over week versus -18.6% for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower. Lifetime, Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] has more visits (98.2M vs 21.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,118
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower 💃
1,626
playing now
3,141 24h peak · 21.9M visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] Would You Rather: Emote Testing TowerDifference
Playing now1,1181,626508
24h peak1,9923,1411,149 (1.6×)
24h average1,4792,112633
7-day peak2,3783,233855
7-day average1,6332,147514
30-day peak2,3784,4432,065 (1.9×)
All-time peak2,3864,4432,057 (1.9×)
24h change 21.1% 1.0%
7d change 10.6% 18.6%
Total visits98.2M21.9M76.3M (4.5×)
Visits (24h)126.5K315K188.5K (2.5×)
Visits (7d)932.9K2.4M1.5M (2.6×)
Favorites1.8M2M188.7K
Rating91.4%84.9%
Global rank (players)#1,033#741of 8,338
Trending score-29.5-5.4
CreatedJun 30, 2017Apr 13, 2026
GenreSimulationObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 14 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.