Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Combat Warriors

Combat Warriors currently leads with 2,685 concurrent players against 1,216, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Combat Warriors at 3,236 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +10.7% week over week versus -1.8% for Combat Warriors. Lifetime, Combat Warriors has more visits (1.4B vs 98.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Combat Warriors is charted above.

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]
1,216
playing now
1,992 24h peak · 98.2M visits
VS
Combat Warriors
2,685
playing now
3,236 24h peak · 1.4B visits

Player count history

Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]Combat Warriors

Head to head

Metric Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] Combat WarriorsDifference
Playing now1,2162,6851,469 (2.2×)
24h peak1,9923,2361,244 (1.6×)
24h average1,5102,6461,136 (1.8×)
7-day peak2,3783,236858
7-day average1,6362,420784
30-day peak2,3783,236858
All-time peak2,3863,236850
24h change 19.6% 1.2%
7d change 10.7% 1.8%
Total visits98.2M1.4B1.3B (14.7×)
Visits (24h)127.2K228.6K101.4K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)932.7K1.6M636.9K (1.7×)
Favorites1.8M2.4M588.5K
Rating91.4%83.5%
Global rank (players)#1,045#526of 8,339
Trending score-24.131.6
CreatedJun 30, 2017Nov 3, 2019
GenreSimulationAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 14 for Combat Warriors.