Viral Emotes Testing vs Slime RNG

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,252 concurrent players against 1,231, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,252 concurrent players, versus 1,352. Lifetime, Slime RNG has more visits (532.4M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Viral Emotes Testing and Slime RNG is charted above.

Viral Emotes Testing
2,252
playing now
2,188 24h peak · 1.5M visits
VS
Slime RNG
1,231
playing now
1,304 24h peak · 532.4M visits

Player count history

Viral Emotes TestingSlime RNG

Head to head

Metric Viral Emotes Testing Slime RNGDifference
Playing now2,2521,2311,021 (1.8×)
24h peak2,1881,304884 (1.7×)
24h average1,7431,230513
7-day peak2,1881,352836 (1.6×)
7-day average1,7431,212531
30-day peak2,1881,352836 (1.6×)
All-time peak2,2521,352900 (1.7×)
24h change 2.6%
7d change
Total visits1.5M532.4M530.8M (347.1×)
Visits (24h)77.6K130.5K52.9K (1.7×)
Visits (7d)77.6K526.8K449.2K (6.8×)
Favorites4.4K3.5M3.5M (801.4×)
Rating74.0%97.7%
Global rank (players)#911#1,313of 4,575
Trending score0.04.5
CreatedJul 1, 2026Feb 25, 2026
GenreSocialSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 1 days for Viral Emotes Testing, 5 for Slime RNG.

Viral Emotes Testing vs Slime RNG — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals