Viral Emotes Testing vs [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,204 concurrent players against 1,699. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,252 concurrent players, versus 2,191. Lifetime, [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem has more visits (10M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Viral Emotes Testing and [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem is charted above.

Viral Emotes Testing
2,204
playing now
2,252 24h peak Β· 1.5M visits
VS
[πŸ‘· WORKERS] Cut a Gem
1,699
playing now
2,149 24h peak Β· 10M visits

Player count history

Viral Emotes Testing[ WORKERS] Cut a Gem

Head to head

Metric Viral Emotes Testing [ WORKERS] Cut a GemDifference
Playing now2,2041,699505
24h peak2,2522,149103
24h average1,8491,674175
7-day peak2,2522,19161
7-day average1,8491,533316
30-day peak2,2522,19161
All-time peak2,2522,19161
24h changeβ€”β–² 25.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.5M10M8.4M (6.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)91.5K149.5K57.9K (1.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)91.5K594.8K503.3K (6.5Γ—)
Favorites4.4K342.2K337.7K (77.5Γ—)
Rating74.1%97.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#856#1,066of 4,575
Trending score0.029.2β€”
CreatedJul 1, 2026May 23, 2026β€”
GenreSocialSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 1 days for Viral Emotes Testing, 5 for [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem.

Viral Emotes Testing vs [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals