HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Depth Spelunking

Depth Spelunking currently leads with 344 concurrent players against 330. On all-time peak the record belongs to Depth Spelunking at 1,226 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +7.6% week over week versus -38.3% for Depth Spelunking. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 22M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Depth Spelunking is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
330
playing now
527 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
Depth Spelunking
344
playing now
775 24h peak · 22M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Depth Spelunking

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Depth SpelunkingDifference
Playing now33034414
24h peak527775248
24h average318535217 (1.7×)
7-day peak5741,050476 (1.8×)
7-day average310576266 (1.9×)
30-day peak5741,226652 (2.1×)
All-time peak5841,226642 (2.1×)
24h change 2.6% 4.8%
7d change 7.6% 38.3%
Total visits77.9M22M55.9M (3.5×)
Visits (24h)36.9K38.3K1.4K
Visits (7d)245.6K276K30.3K
Favorites95.5K209.1K113.5K (2.2×)
Rating80.4%92.8%
Global rank (players)#2,598#2,514of 8,009
Trending score6.0-18.7
CreatedOct 25, 2021Dec 14, 2021
GenreSports & RacingSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 13 for Depth Spelunking.