HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Scary Baboon (beta)
Scary Baboon (beta) currently leads with 739 concurrent players against 349, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Scary Baboon (beta) at 1,106 concurrent players, versus 584. Momentum favours HCBB 9v9 2.0: +7.5% week over week versus -1.8% for Scary Baboon (beta). Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.9M vs 1.9M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Scary Baboon (beta) is charted above.
HCBB 9v9 2.0
349
playing now
527 24h peak · 77.9M visits
VS
Scary Baboon (beta)
739
playing now
1,050 24h peak · 1.9M visits
Player count history
HCBB 9v9 2.0Scary Baboon (beta)
Head to head
| Metric | HCBB 9v9 2.0 | Scary Baboon (beta) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 349 | 739 | 390 (2.1×) |
| 24h peak | 527 | 1,050 | 523 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 353 | 788 | 435 (2.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 574 | 1,050 | 476 (1.8×) |
| 7-day average | 315 | 721 | 406 (2.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 574 | 1,050 | 476 (1.8×) |
| All-time peak | 584 | 1,106 | 522 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 8.6% | ▲ 5.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 7.5% | ▼ 1.8% | — |
| Total visits | 77.9M | 1.9M | 76M (41.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 38.5K | 143.4K | 104.8K (3.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 245.6K | 929.3K | 683.7K (3.8×) |
| Favorites | 95.5K | 3.1K | 92.5K (30.9×) |
| Rating | 80.4% | 92.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,527 | #1,733 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 28.6 | 26.1 | — |
| Created | Oct 25, 2021 | Jul 22, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 11 for Scary Baboon (beta).