HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs 10 Player Flee

10 Player Flee currently leads with 2,192 concurrent players against 506, a 4.3Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to 10 Player Flee at 2,511 concurrent players, versus 519. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 51.9M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and 10 Player Flee is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
506
playing now
519 24h peak Β· 77.6M visits
VS
πŸŒ™ 10 Player Flee
2,192
playing now
2,366 24h peak Β· 51.9M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.010 Player Flee

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 10 Player FleeDifference
Playing now5062,1921,686 (4.3Γ—)
24h peak5192,3661,847 (4.6Γ—)
24h average3381,6991,361 (5.0Γ—)
7-day peak5192,5111,992 (4.8Γ—)
7-day average2851,7511,466 (6.1Γ—)
30-day peak5192,5111,992 (4.8Γ—)
All-time peak5192,5111,992 (4.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 36.8%β–² 4.7%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits77.6M51.9M25.7M
Visits (24h)31.9K135.9K104K (4.3Γ—)
Visits (7d)61.9K505.4K443.5K (8.2Γ—)
Favorites95.3K126.4K31.1K
Rating80.4%87.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,763#783of 4,381
Trending score43.5-9.5β€”
CreatedOct 25, 2021May 24, 2024β€”
GenreSports & RacingSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 5 for 10 Player Flee.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs 10 Player Flee β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals