HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Firefighting-Simulation: Schrietz

HCBB 9v9 2.0 currently leads with 487 concurrent players against 55, a 8.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to HCBB 9v9 2.0 at 528 concurrent players, versus 520. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 2.3M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Firefighting-Simulation: Schrietz is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
487
playing now
528 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
Firefighting-Simulation: Schrietz
55
playing now
520 24h peak · 2.3M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Firefighting-Simulation: Schrietz

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Firefighting-Simulation: SchrietzDifference
Playing now48755432 (8.9×)
24h peak5285208
24h average352212140 (1.7×)
7-day peak5285208
7-day average29322469
30-day peak5285208
All-time peak5285208
24h change 40.2% 4.4%
7d change
Total visits77.6M2.3M75.3M (33.5×)
Visits (24h)32.4K31.3K1.1K
Visits (7d)64K97.3K33.3K (1.5×)
Favorites95.3K7.3K88.1K (13.1×)
Rating80.4%89.7%
Global rank (players)#1,816#3,113of 4,381
Trending score47.5-11.3
CreatedOct 25, 2021Mar 11, 2025
GenreSports & RacingRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 5 for Firefighting-Simulation: Schrietz.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Firefighting-Simulation: Schrietz — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals