HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 3,765 concurrent players against 480, a 7.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 528. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (615.9M vs 77.6M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Eat the World is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
480
playing now
528 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
Eat the World
3,765
playing now
4,969 24h peak · 615.9M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Eat the World

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now4803,7653,285 (7.8×)
24h peak5284,9694,441 (9.4×)
24h average3723,7893,417 (10.2×)
7-day peak5285,2404,712 (9.9×)
7-day average2983,8113,513 (12.8×)
30-day peak5285,2404,712 (9.9×)
All-time peak5285,2614,733 (10.0×)
24h change 24.0% 4.7%
7d change
Total visits77.6M615.9M538.3M (7.9×)
Visits (24h)35.8K402K366.3K (11.2×)
Visits (7d)98.6K1.8M1.7M (18.0×)
Favorites95.3K27.8M27.7M (291.6×)
Rating80.4%94.7%
Global rank (players)#1,906#473of 5,050
Trending score59.2-2.0
CreatedOct 25, 2021Feb 22, 2024
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 6 for Eat the World.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals