HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Catalog Emotes Testing

Catalog Emotes Testing currently leads with 3,743 concurrent players against 482, a 7.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Catalog Emotes Testing at 5,281 concurrent players, versus 528. Lifetime, HCBB 9v9 2.0 has more visits (77.6M vs 29.8M). Full side-by-side history for HCBB 9v9 2.0 and Catalog Emotes Testing is charted above.

HCBB 9v9 2.0
482
playing now
528 24h peak · 77.6M visits
VS
Catalog Emotes Testing ✨
3,743
playing now
5,080 24h peak · 29.8M visits

Player count history

HCBB 9v9 2.0Catalog Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric HCBB 9v9 2.0 Catalog Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now4823,7433,261 (7.8×)
24h peak5285,0804,552 (9.6×)
24h average3753,6503,275 (9.7×)
7-day peak5285,2474,719 (9.9×)
7-day average3013,5643,263 (11.8×)
30-day peak5285,2474,719 (9.9×)
All-time peak5285,2814,753 (10.0×)
24h change 24.2% 1.7%
7d change
Total visits77.6M29.8M47.8M (2.6×)
Visits (24h)35.3K535.3K500K (15.2×)
Visits (7d)100.5K1.8M1.7M (18.4×)
Favorites95.3K241.1K145.7K (2.5×)
Rating80.4%83.7%
Global rank (players)#1,929#504of 5,050
Trending score58.78.5
CreatedOct 25, 2021Jun 4, 2026
GenreSports & RacingSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for HCBB 9v9 2.0, 5 for Catalog Emotes Testing.

HCBB 9v9 2.0 vs Catalog Emotes Testing — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals