RIOTFALL [FPS] vs Build a Soccer Team
Build a Soccer Team currently leads with 1,062 concurrent players against 278, a 3.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build a Soccer Team at 4,254 concurrent players, versus 4,039. Lifetime, RIOTFALL [FPS] has more visits (33.4M vs 5M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and Build a Soccer Team is charted above.
RIOTFALL [FPS]
278
playing now
543 24h peak · 33.4M visits
VS
Build a Soccer Team [🎲]
1,062
playing now
1,216 24h peak · 5M visits
Player count history
RIOTFALL [FPS]Build a Soccer Team
Head to head
| Metric | RIOTFALL [FPS] | Build a Soccer Team | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 278 | 1,062 | 784 (3.8×) |
| 24h peak | 543 | 1,216 | 673 (2.2×) |
| 24h average | 343 | 1,050 | 707 (3.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,981 | 4,093 | 112 |
| 7-day average | 1,389 | 1,125 | 264 |
| 30-day peak | 3,981 | 4,093 | 112 |
| All-time peak | 4,039 | 4,254 | 215 |
| 24h change | ▼ 87.9% | ▼ 6.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 15.4% | — |
| Total visits | 33.4M | 5M | 28.4M (6.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 71.6K | 94.3K | 22.7K |
| Visits (7d) | 735.4K | 764.5K | 29.1K |
| Favorites | 417.6K | 8.5K | 409.1K (49.0×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 96.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,486 | #1,215 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -188.5 | -19.7 | — |
| Created | Oct 21, 2021 | Jun 27, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 10 for Build a Soccer Team.