RIOTFALL [FPS] vs Shepherd Simulator

Shepherd Simulator currently leads with 2,342 concurrent players against 279, a 8.4Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to RIOTFALL [FPS] at 4,039 concurrent players, versus 2,854. Lifetime, RIOTFALL [FPS] has more visits (33.4M vs 21.6M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and Shepherd Simulator is charted above.

RIOTFALL [FPS]
279
playing now
619 24h peak Β· 33.4M visits
VS
πŸ‘ Shepherd Simulator
2,342
playing now
2,854 24h peak Β· 21.6M visits

Player count history

RIOTFALL [FPS]Shepherd Simulator

Head to head

Metric RIOTFALL [FPS] Shepherd SimulatorDifference
Playing now2792,3422,063 (8.4Γ—)
24h peak6192,8542,235 (4.6Γ—)
24h average3662,2541,888 (6.2Γ—)
7-day peak3,9812,8541,127
7-day average1,4181,798380
30-day peak3,9812,8541,127
All-time peak4,0392,8541,185
24h changeβ–Ό 87.5%β–² 33.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β–² 80.9%β€”
Total visits33.4M21.6M11.8M (1.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)71.7K166.9K95.2K (2.3Γ—)
Visits (7d)731.5K1.1M344.8K
Favorites417.6K97.8K319.8K (4.3Γ—)
Rating83.7%92.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,532#677of 7,127
Trending score-187.783.9β€”
CreatedOct 21, 2021Mar 11, 2026β€”
GenreShooterSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 2 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 10 for Shepherd Simulator.

RIOTFALL [FPS] vs Shepherd Simulator β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals