BAD CAT vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

BAD CAT currently leads with 1,704 concurrent players against 1,391. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower at 4,443 concurrent players, versus 3,185. Momentum favours BAD CAT: +10.0% week over week versus -19.2% for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (371.2M vs 21.6M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.

BAD CAT
1,704
playing now
3,185 24h peak · 371.2M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower 💃
1,391
playing now
2,960 24h peak · 21.6M visits

Player count history

BAD CATWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT Would You Rather: Emote Testing TowerDifference
Playing now1,7041,391313
24h peak3,1852,960225
24h average1,9461,90937
7-day peak3,1853,557372
7-day average1,4172,137720 (1.5×)
30-day peak3,1854,4431,258
All-time peak3,1854,4431,258
24h change 18.9% 12.3%
7d change 10.0% 19.2%
Total visits371.2M21.6M349.6M (17.2×)
Visits (24h)254.2K321K66.8K
Visits (7d)1.3M2.4M1.2M (1.9×)
Favorites1.1M1.9M845.8K (1.8×)
Rating86.5%84.9%
Global rank (players)#897#1,047of 8,017
Trending score120.7-34.6
CreatedAug 30, 2021Apr 13, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for BAD CAT, 13 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.