BAD CAT vs +1 Height Per Jump

BAD CAT currently leads with 1,771 concurrent players against 1,083, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Height Per Jump at 3,636 concurrent players, versus 3,185. Momentum favours BAD CAT: +10.0% week over week versus -7.2% for +1 Height Per Jump. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (371.2M vs 16.1M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and +1 Height Per Jump is charted above.

BAD CAT
1,771
playing now
3,185 24h peak · 371.2M visits
VS
+1 Height Per Jump
1,083
playing now
2,500 24h peak · 16.1M visits

Player count history

BAD CAT+1 Height Per Jump

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT +1 Height Per JumpDifference
Playing now1,7711,083688 (1.6×)
24h peak3,1852,500685
24h average1,9461,259687 (1.5×)
7-day peak3,1853,556371
7-day average1,4171,834417
30-day peak3,1853,556371
All-time peak3,1853,636451
24h change 18.9% 34.3%
7d change 10.0% 7.2%
Total visits371.2M16.1M355.1M (23.1×)
Visits (24h)254.2K130.9K123.3K (1.9×)
Visits (7d)1.3M1.3M27.6K
Favorites1.1M37.4K1.1M (29.5×)
Rating86.5%98.1%
Global rank (players)#897#1,319of 8,017
Trending score120.7-96.0
CreatedAug 30, 2021Jun 26, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for BAD CAT, 13 for +1 Height Per Jump.