BAD CAT vs [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG

BAD CAT currently leads with 1,373 concurrent players against 425, a 3.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG at 3,249 concurrent players, versus 3,185. Momentum favours BAD CAT: +10.9% week over week versus -23.9% for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (371.4M vs 24.9M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG is charted above.

BAD CAT
1,373
playing now
2,383 24h peak · 371.4M visits
VS
[⛈️THUNDERSTORM]🎲 EMOTE RNG
425
playing now
612 24h peak · 24.9M visits

Player count history

BAD CAT[THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG

Head to head

Metric BAD CAT [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNGDifference
Playing now1,373425948 (3.2×)
24h peak2,3836121,771 (3.9×)
24h average1,7264851,241 (3.6×)
7-day peak3,0272,735292
7-day average1,444488956 (3.0×)
30-day peak3,0272,735292
All-time peak3,1853,24964
24h change 20.0% 28.0%
7d change 10.9% 23.9%
Total visits371.4M24.9M346.5M (14.9×)
Visits (24h)219.6K44.2K175.4K (5.0×)
Visits (7d)1.3M290.9K1M (4.5×)
Favorites1.1M37.7K1.1M (29.3×)
Rating86.5%88.2%
Global rank (players)#1,017#2,119of 8,339
Trending score62.2-1.6
CreatedAug 30, 2021Aug 1, 2025
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for BAD CAT, 14 for [THUNDERSTORM] EMOTE RNG.