BAD CAT vs [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 2,296 concurrent players against 2,110. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,693 concurrent players, versus 2,408. Momentum favours [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +256.7% week over week versus +13.9% for BAD CAT. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (371M vs 3.7M). Full side-by-side history for BAD CAT and [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
BAD CAT
2,110
playing now
2,408 24h peak · 371M visits
VS
[⭐UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
2,296
playing now
2,693 24h peak · 3.7M visits
Player count history
BAD CAT[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | BAD CAT | [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,110 | 2,296 | 186 |
| 24h peak | 2,408 | 2,693 | 285 |
| 24h average | 1,768 | 2,189 | 421 |
| 7-day peak | 2,408 | 2,693 | 285 |
| 7-day average | 1,384 | 1,698 | 314 |
| 30-day peak | 2,408 | 2,693 | 285 |
| All-time peak | 2,408 | 2,693 | 285 |
| 24h change | ▲ 31.2% | ▲ 17.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 13.9% | ▲ 256.7% | — |
| Total visits | 371M | 3.7M | 367.2M (99.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 202.7K | 434.8K | 232K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 2.7M | 1.5M (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 1.1M | 23.9K | 1.1M (46.1×) |
| Rating | 86.5% | 91.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #759 | #696 | of 7,707 |
| Trending score | 88.6 | 95.2 | — |
| Created | Aug 30, 2021 | Jul 29, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for BAD CAT, 11 for [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].