Build to Survive! vs Chained in Backrooms

Build to Survive! currently leads with 785 concurrent players against 472, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive! at 1,004 concurrent players, versus 713. Lifetime, Build to Survive! has more visits (768.3M vs 106.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive! and Chained in Backrooms is charted above.

Build to Survive!
785
playing now
1,003 24h peak · 768.3M visits
VS
Chained in Backrooms
472
playing now
544 24h peak · 106.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive!Chained in Backrooms

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive! Chained in BackroomsDifference
Playing now785472313 (1.7×)
24h peak1,003544459 (1.8×)
24h average760432328 (1.8×)
7-day peak1,003661342 (1.5×)
7-day average743431312 (1.7×)
30-day peak1,003661342 (1.5×)
All-time peak1,004713291
24h change 6.1% 10.2%
7d change 14.3%
Total visits768.3M106.1M662.2M (7.2×)
Visits (24h)57.7K157K99.2K (2.7×)
Visits (7d)179.8K1.2M1.1M (6.8×)
Favorites688K588.4K99.7K
Rating80.8%72.1%
Global rank (players)#1,505#2,001of 7,127
Trending score6.40.6
CreatedAug 14, 2021Apr 21, 2025
GenreSurvivalObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive!, 10 for Chained in Backrooms.

Build to Survive! vs Chained in Backrooms — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals