Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander currently leads with 5,126 concurrent players against 4,931. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander at 6,746 concurrent players, versus 6,072. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.5M vs 22.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,931
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits
VS
[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
5,126
playing now
6,480 24h peak Β· 22.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderDifference
Playing now4,9315,126195
24h peak6,0726,480408
24h average5,0854,983102
7-day peak6,0726,746674
7-day average4,5154,927412
30-day peak6,0726,746674
All-time peak6,0726,746674
24h changeβ–² 19.9%β–² 8.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.5M22.1M242.3M (11.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)424.3K500.4K76.1K
Visits (7d)922.9K1.7M816.6K (1.9Γ—)
Favorites5.5M84K5.4M (65.8Γ—)
Rating96.5%95.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#320#307of 4,279
Trending score46.54.2β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 10, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 4 for [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals