Build to Survive vs Build to Survive [TESTING]

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,360 concurrent players against 4,931. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 6,072. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (404.9M vs 264.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,360
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 404.9M visits
VS
Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,931
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.5M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveBuild to Survive [TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Build to Survive [TESTING]Difference
Playing now5,3604,931429
24h peak6,6076,072535
24h average5,3015,085216
7-day peak6,7446,072672
7-day average5,2694,515754
30-day peak6,7446,072672
All-time peak6,7446,072672
24h changeβ–² 2.1%β–² 19.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits404.9M264.5M140.4M (1.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)492.1K424.3K67.8K
Visits (7d)1.1M922.9K221.2K
Favorites10.9M5.5M5.3M (2.0Γ—)
Rating96.2%96.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#311#320of 4,279
Trending score2.346.5β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Aug 12, 2021β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for Build to Survive, 3 for Build to Survive [TESTING].

Build to Survive vs Build to Survive [TESTING] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals