Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Dig to Escape

Dig to Escape currently leads with 8,213 concurrent players against 4,685, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Dig to Escape at 15,042 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Dig to Escape: +48.8% week over week versus +11.1% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Dig to Escape has more visits (553.8M vs 268.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Dig to Escape is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,685
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.5M visits
VS
⛏️Dig to Escape
8,213
playing now
15,042 24h peak · 553.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Dig to Escape

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Dig to EscapeDifference
Playing now4,6858,2133,528 (1.8×)
24h peak6,29715,0428,745 (2.4×)
24h average4,9039,8664,963 (2.0×)
7-day peak7,55715,0427,485 (2.0×)
7-day average5,1098,2973,188 (1.6×)
30-day peak7,55715,0427,485 (2.0×)
All-time peak7,72915,0427,313 (1.9×)
24h change 3.3% 5.2%
7d change 11.1% 48.8%
Total visits268.5M553.8M285.3M (2.1×)
Visits (24h)440.8K1.4M945.9K (3.1×)
Visits (7d)3.3M7.6M4.3M (2.3×)
Favorites5.6M560.2K5M (10.0×)
Rating96.5%97.8%
Global rank (players)#355#192of 8,020
Trending score-14.875.3
CreatedAug 12, 2021Nov 10, 2025
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for Dig to Escape.